Thanks shlomi
The lg configuration is quad core processor with 4GB RAM. We are using 20 LG with running 25 users each. The CPU consumption in lg was nearly 80%. We are giving step timeout of 180 sec because of application responding very slow to pull query record in first attempt taking nearly 9 min for launch transaction. We checked the response time manually as well during test. It's almost same to load runner results. We also checked the application showing down due to some issues error when checking manually duringthe test. Also the server logs for CPU and memory for proxy server was not captured with Perfmon during the test.
My question here is we have 5 scripts in tru client protocol and 1 script in web protocol. We have an average of 19 hit per sec in both protocol results.we have given 10min as pacing in tru client and less pacing in web.
Average hits per sec are one and same. But throughout bytes consumed was showing very less in truculent protocol.what is the reason for the difference?
Regards
Raghul
The lg configuration is quad core processor with 4GB RAM. We are using 20 LG with running 25 users each. The CPU consumption in lg was nearly 80%. We are giving step timeout of 180 sec because of application responding very slow to pull query record in first attempt taking nearly 9 min for launch transaction. We checked the response time manually as well during test. It's almost same to load runner results. We also checked the application showing down due to some issues error when checking manually duringthe test. Also the server logs for CPU and memory for proxy server was not captured with Perfmon during the test.
My question here is we have 5 scripts in tru client protocol and 1 script in web protocol. We have an average of 19 hit per sec in both protocol results.we have given 10min as pacing in tru client and less pacing in web.
Average hits per sec are one and same. But throughout bytes consumed was showing very less in truculent protocol.what is the reason for the difference?
Regards
Raghul