Quantcast
Channel: All LoadRunner Practitioners Forum posts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12134

Re: TruClient transactions slower than Web - HTTP/HTML?

$
0
0

Thanks for the reply, Gary, but I'm afraid it isn't any clearer.

 

I'm not sure what you mean by specifying the End Event of the transaction.  I added both the Start Transaction and the End Transaction around the Login step.  Is there something else I should be doing?

 

Based on which protocol I use, the number of logins per minute is different by a factor of five.  For 50 VUsers, the Web - HTTP/HTML protocol shows 500 Passed/minute, but for TruClient IE I only get 100 Passed per minute.  This makes it incredibly difficult to calculate the number of users I need to reach the expected load, which for this application is 15,000 logins per hour.  With the Web - HTTP/HTML protocol, I'm already at two times the full expected load with 50 VUsers, but with the TruClient test, I'm at just over a third of the expected load with 50 VUsers. 

 

How do I reconcile that the transaction times are so far off from each other?  Have all of my previous Web - HTTP/HTML tests been that far off?  That would be really unsettling to me, because I've signed off on applications based on data that may be off by a factor of five, if what you're saying about TruClient being much closer to an actual user is correct.

 

Thanks,

Matt


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12134

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images